Research question
Which genomic regions carry consistent evidence of selection, and how do their haplotype patterns differ across breeds?
Population genomics · Quantitative biology
Von Genomen zu biologischen Geschichten.
Population genomics, selection signatures, and reproducible research in avian systems.
Explore research↗Based in Australia
Open to collaboration
Lead project · 01
Selection signatures across domesticated goose populations
Within-population homozygosity
Schematic interface using verified project scale; locus coordinates are intentionally omitted until publication review.
FCG
RESEARCH
PORTFOLIO
01 · Featured research
The project combines four complementary signals to identify genomic regions that distinguish Fengcheng Grey Goose from domestic comparison populations.
Which genomic regions carry consistent evidence of selection, and how do their haplotype patterns differ across breeds?
Genome-wide scans are reconciled through provenance-aware overlap, followed by pathway enrichment and reference-anchored haplotype analysis.
Priority and provisional regions are tracked separately so that strength of evidence remains visible.
Fst · GWAS · XP-EHH
PriorityzHP · GWAS · XP-EHH
PriorityFst · GWAS · XP-EHH
Gene clusterzHP · GWAS · XP-EHH
Provisional02 · Methods
Each stage is designed to remain traceable—from sample selection and coordinate locking to final figures and audit tables.
Within-population homozygosity
Population differentiation
Cross-population selection
Trait association
RESEARCH
EXPERIENCE
03 · Experience
Current experience is centred on population-scale data, selection scans, candidate-locus synthesis, and publication-ready scientific visualisation.
Genome-wide zHP, Fst, XP-EHH, and GWAS workflows with explicit thresholds and quality checks.
FCG-anchored phased haplotypes, within-breed clustering, distance summaries, and exact-region gene structures.
Publication figures, provenance tables, GO/KEGG synthesis, and auditable reports for complex analyses.
Formal integration of selection scans, enrichment, candidate-locus review, and fine mapping.
AREG–EREG/IL8, CD4/MLF2, CAV1/CAV2, and provisional RUNX2 regions.
Consolidating figures, biological interpretation, and a reproducible methods record.
04 · Research notes
Short field notes will document why analytical choices were made—not only what was run.
Why FCG-anchored haplotypes answer a different question from global REF/ALT encoding.
How coordinate locks, no-overwrite rules, and preflight checks prevent silent analysis drift.
Separating priority, clustered, and provisional candidate loci before biological interpretation.